Skip to main content

EMSA

 
When the MS Bimini Superfast was operating as the MS Superfast VI in Europe she was under Greek Registry.  So for example if she was on one of the Adriatic ferry runs say from Ancona, Italy to Patras, Greece she would have a Flag State of Greece and a Port State of Italy.  Each of these countries would be responsible to see that she operated safely under the International Maritime Organization (IMO) Code of the Seafarer's Training, Certification and Watchkeeping Code (STCW).  Both these countries are as European Union Nations members of the European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA).

Since in theory all vessels are subject to and follow IMO-STCW this vessel should have arrived here in the United States in a state of readiness to operate after its Port State inspection by our USCG.  The MS Bimini Superfast arrived here in the Port of Miami, FL under the Flag State of the Republic of Panama fully certified by her Flag State to carry passengers once it had been issued its Port State U.S. Passenger Certificate which shows it had passed the inspection by the USCG Marine Safety Office (MSO) for the number of passengers allowed by that certificate.

To date the MS Bimini Superfast has failed miserably as we have written about several times already. So with EMSA being the marine safety body in the European Union how could this happen?  The EMSA www.emsa.europa.eu is headquartered in Lisbon, Portugal and has a comprehensive website, complete with a mission statement, which one can visit to learn all about them.  That mission statement reads as follows:

"The Agency,
To ensure a high, uniform and effective level of maritime safety and security as well as prevention of and response to pollution by ships within the EU."

Now NAUTICAL LOG read this statement - which is stunningly short -  and immediately noticed that there is absolutely no mention of either the IMO or the STCW which one understood is the Code which was written to achieve the points made in the opening of the EMSA mission statement.

So here we have a vessel which has been under the "watchful eye" of the EMSA which cannot pass the USCG-MSO Inspection and cannot transition power to the ship's emergency systems.  So it is possible that:
  • This situation always occurred and was passed over by EMSA.
  • Sloppy inspections by EMSA never knew of this inability to transition power.
  • The current ship's engineers do not know how to follow the transition protocol.
  • The current ship's engineers attempted an improper transition and damaged the system.
No doubt the USCG-MSO knows of the inspection standard of EMSA and as a result go over formerly European based vessels with extreme care - thankfully since we now sail in these vessels - and as a result continue to hold the MS Bimini Superfast in the Port of Miami, FL.  One might note in passing this is by no means the first vessel that arrived in the Port of Miami from the European Union and found itself in this situation.  NAUTICAL LOG has been called to two of such vessels to train crews, conduct drills and work with USCG-MSO to get them U.S. Certified and the ship sailing with passengers.  In both cases NAUTICAL LOG remained with the vessel for some time as Safety Officer to continue training the crew and supervising drills held daily and weekly.

Good Watch.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

PAINT LOCKER FIRES

The photographs above are revealing in several ways, lets have a look. Clearly the Japanese Maritime Self Defence Force (JMSDF) vessel JS "Kurama" impacted the Korean container ship MS "Carina Star" just aft of the turn of the fo'cs'le on the Starboard side. Please note that's the Starboard side, thus it appears JS "Kurama" would have shown "Carina Star" the red port sidelight and "Carina Star" would have shown JS "Kurama" the green starboard sidelight. This impact point would tend to suggest that JS "Kurama" was the 'stand-on' vessel and the MS "Carina Star" is the 'giving-way' vessel. Until there is a complete plot of the tracks made good of both these vessels and the position in the Kanmon Strait of the point of collision no determination can actually be made. As a result of this impact there was severe bow damage to JS "Kurama" and in addition a massive f

HOW TO WEAR A LIFEJACKET

A popular U.S.-based cruise ship style A popular European ferry style Several times during the year NAUTICAL LOG has had visitors searching for lifejacket instructions. With two just over Christmas we decided to publish something for everybody to see and read. Choose a Coast Guard approved life-jacket and make sure it is undamaged. Make sure life-jackets are readily accessible, never locked away. Check the fit, there are adult, child and infant sizes, the correct one MUST be used. Choose bright colour life-jackets so as to be seen easily by Search and Rescue (SAR). Put your life-jacket ON BEFORE you leave the berth. Make sure you have a light and whistle attached AND they BOTH WORK. Good Watch

BOUILLABAISSE

TAAF Service vessel operated by CMA CGM TAAF Regional flag Well now let us see if here at NAUTICAL LOG we have got a grasp on things simmering in the pot. It seems that when the anti-whaling campaign started out some years ago it was between Greenpeace, the Sea Shepherds and the Japanese whaling fleet. The Australians came down to their own Southern Ocean Territory in a chartered civilian vessel one year. Beyond taking photographs and returning some Sea Shepherds to their ship the MS "Steve Irwin" not much was accomplished. The Greenpeace crowd then dropped out and Animal Planet boarded the MS "Steve Irwin" to shoot 'reality TV' and so Whale Wars came into being. This resulted in some deplorable behaviour on all sides and some appalling exhibitions of seamanship - or rather total lack of seamanship by the Sea Shepherds. But now there was money coming in which could be spent on - well nobody really knows what the money is spent on. New Zealand made it q