Skip to main content

NO SOLOS

UPDATE Sunday June 10, 2012.

More good news this morning as the vessel MS Last Tycoon rescued Charlie Martell, so two down two saved.

This year there have been several solo seafarers who got themselves into trouble and had to be rescued.  They have been from various countries and sadly one a British male was lost.  Now comes news of two other British seafarers having to be rescued in the northern Pacific by the Japanese Coastguard fortunately the rescue of Sarah Outen was successful.  Further north eastwards from Japan in the northern Pacific a second British solo seafarer Charlie Martell awaits rescue.


As regular readers will know NAUTICAL LOG is absolutely against these voyages by solo seafarers regardless of their age or capabilities.


But why?


Any voyage which extends long enough to cause a solo seafarer sufficient tiredness as to require rest is extremely foolish.  If the solo seafarer has to get some rest it means of course that while underway there is no lookout posted.  This is very very stupid and is an absolute violation of the Rules of the Road specifically Rule 5 - no this time NAUTICAL LOG is not going to write it out for you go look it up.


The violation of Rule 5 means that as well as the solo seafarers life other seafarers lives are put in jeopardy this is an abuse of our privilege to use the seas for both pleasure and commercial operations.


Considering the dangers lurking at sea today additional to its usual hazards such as piracy one would hope that National Maritime Authorities and Yachting Organizations would discourage these solo seafarer voyages.  In addition of course we have National Rescue Services such as in these latest cases the Japanese Coastguard having to launch extensive and expensive rescue operations for which there is virtually no chance to get reimbursed by the rescued persons.

Perhaps if these solo seafarers insist on going on long voyages they should have to purchase a Marine Insurance Policy of Responsibility to cover the cost of their Search and Rescue (SAR) should that become necessary.  After all a Certificate of Pollution Responsibility must be purchased by all commercial vessels and many non-commercial vessels to cover that cost. No Policy no Clearance!


Good Watch.

There remain some 600 of our fellow seafarers held hostage by pirates off the coast of Puntland, Somalia.  As such they face mutilation and/or death every day.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

HOW TO WEAR A LIFEJACKET

A popular U.S.-based cruise ship style
A popular European ferry style

Several times during the year NAUTICAL LOG has had visitors searching for lifejacket instructions. With two just over Christmas we decided to publish something for everybody to see and read.
Choose a Coast Guard approved life-jacket and make sure it is undamaged. Make sure life-jackets are readily accessible, never locked away. Check the fit, there are adult, child and infant sizes, the correct one MUST be used. Choose bright colour life-jackets so as to be seen easily by Search and Rescue (SAR).Put your life-jacket ON BEFORE you leave the berth. Make sure you have a light and whistle attached AND they BOTH WORK.
Good Watch

CHARTERING - TYPES OF CHARTERS

Voyage Charter:

A contract (C/P) for hire of the use of a vessel to make a specific voyage between two identified terminal ports. The vessel will be carrying cargo or passengers for and on behalf of the Charterer's. The Charterer's pay for the the use of the ship either on the basis of a lump sum or in the case of cargo at a 'Freight Rate'. This freight rate is so much per tonne carried and delivered. This would not be the form of charter normally used in the business of yacht chartering.

Time Charter:

A contract (C/P) for the hire of the use of a vessel for a specified period of time and can take one of two basic forms,

* Basic Time Charter
* Demise or Bareboat Charter

The Basic Time Charter;

An agreement between the owner of a vessel, or if allowed the disponent owner, and a charterer who wishes to use the vessel for his own purposes without being responsible for the operation of neither the vessel or its day-to-day management.
Throughout the period of the charter the owner/…

PAINT LOCKER FIRES

The photographs above are revealing in several ways, lets have a look. Clearly the Japanese Maritime Self Defence Force (JMSDF) vessel JS "Kurama" impacted the Korean container ship MS "Carina Star" just aft of the turn of the fo'cs'le on the Starboard side. Please note that's the Starboard side, thus it appears JS "Kurama" would have shown "Carina Star" the red port sidelight and "Carina Star" would have shown JS "Kurama" the green starboard sidelight. This impact point would tend to suggest that JS "Kurama" was the 'stand-on' vessel and the MS "Carina Star" is the 'giving-way' vessel. Until there is a complete plot of the tracks made good of both these vessels and the position in the Kanmon Strait of the point of collision no determination can actually be made.
As a result of this impact there was severe bow damage to JS "Kurama" and in addition a massive fire occurr…