Skip to main content


Typical cruise ship having 4000 persons on board
Yesterday we wrote in reply to a really petty pathetic Post about soot in which a cruise ship was accused, falsely actually, because there was no evidence showing she was involved in the incident.  Remember evidence?  There is a whole procedure for collecting it and preserving its integrity.  It is what makes ones case in the Courts, it seems to be lacking in our Courts and in the current Administration these days.  So perhaps we should not be surprised at the Blog author going off half-cocked with no evidence but publishing a cruise ships name as the title to his Post.

In the haste to blame someone for something that happens in the marine environment there is a rush to accuse the cruise lines and in particular cruise ships that are in Port.  If one reflects on this it is really quite strange because with say 4000 passengers and crew spending just a average of $125.00 per diem per person in the Port generates $500,000.00 income per day.  In addition the vessel will generate Pilotage fees, berthing fees, Port passenger dues and taxes, Federal, State and Local Authorities.  Then there are refuelling costs, maintenance and repairs as needed, resupplying the ships storerooms to supply the needs of crew mess rooms, restaurants, bars, shops, casinos and so on.  The ashore hotel rooms for arriving and departing passengers and crew, transportation by taxi and coach to and from the Airport, the flights themselves, all the greeting personnel ashore to look after the 'guests' - the list goes on and on. 

Do you really want to kill the Goose that lays the Golden Egg?  Yet the first thought seems to be how can we "screw the cruise ship".  Here in Florida we have pretty much realised just how the cruise line industry pours monies into the State and work with them to achieve responsible environmental and other needs so that all of us benefit.

It is time that the cruise lines fought back as they have been really complacent.  Here at NAUTICAL LOG we have written quite a few times about Safety issues aboard cruise ships, never once has there been a challenge or even a comment on the opinion expressed in our Posts. It would be valuable to have such comments either confirming our opinion as being accurate or pointing out the different approach taken by the cruise line.  On issues such as the soot article where a ships name was improperly used most definitely strong action should be taken by the cruise line involved.  Such a false accusation reflects poorly on the Ships Command and the Engineering Officers and for the cruise line to ignore this speaks poorly of their respect for the professionalism of their own Officers.

It also speaks poorly for the standards maritime Blogs should be setting for themselves on what to write about, how to write about it and how to acquire evidence that proves their case.  If these standards are not set by ourselves then our Blogs will be reduced to being regarded as petty whinging.  Those of us who really wish to make a difference to improve all maritime life and the boating community in general will not be well regarded.  The fact that the author of the sooty article is teaching a course for the United States Coast Guard does not add anything worthwhile to a worthless article.

Good Watch.

Please remember the 800 of our fellow seafarers held captive by pirates off Somalia.


Popular posts from this blog


A popular U.S.-based cruise ship style
A popular European ferry style

Several times during the year NAUTICAL LOG has had visitors searching for lifejacket instructions. With two just over Christmas we decided to publish something for everybody to see and read.
Choose a Coast Guard approved life-jacket and make sure it is undamaged. Make sure life-jackets are readily accessible, never locked away. Check the fit, there are adult, child and infant sizes, the correct one MUST be used. Choose bright colour life-jackets so as to be seen easily by Search and Rescue (SAR).Put your life-jacket ON BEFORE you leave the berth. Make sure you have a light and whistle attached AND they BOTH WORK.
Good Watch


Ships now operate under the International Management Code for Safe Operation of Ships and for Pollution Prevention (ISM Code).  Since this is a Post on Auditing NAUTICAL LOG, who is a Trained Auditor, will not go through the requirements as these can be found on the Internet and in your local nautical bookshop - you do have a bookshop hopefully as they are a dying breed.  There are two types of Audit an External Audit and an Internal Audit.

The External Audit consists of the Flag State or an outside Auditing Firm coming into the Company and going through all the Protocols, Procedures and associated Manuals.  They may also hold a drill simulating a situation in one of the Company's vessels and observe the results of the Shore Staff dealing with it.  NAUTICAL LOG has been through this experience with two very different Companies and believe me it is a long, difficult, trying day not made any easier by the subsequent debrief.  The External Auditor then prepares a Report which causes a…


This month saw the commissioning into the Irish Naval Service of a new Class of Irish Naval vessel more of the Frigate size than the previously Corvette size.  However they are all classed as Patrol vessels, the new vessel is LÉ Samuel Beckett P61.NAUTICAL LOG wishes her well and a successful service.

The older vessels saw unbelievable service and value for money the first being commissioned in 1979 and continued through the '80's and 90's into the 21st. Century.  During those years in addition to patrolling the stormy seas around the rugged Irish coast they made passages across the Western Ocean to the United States and Canada, south to South America as far as Argentina, and east to Asia as far as Korea.  Such passages are really remarkable for such small vessels and show the competence of Irish seafarers who as Naval Officers and Merchant Marine Officers train together.

Good Watch.