Skip to main content

MISCONCEPTIONS

In a recent Post "AWAY AND BACK" we discussed Piracy.  As regular readers known this is something that disturbs us greatly and the resulting suffering of the captive seafarers held hostage NAUTICAL LOG finds personally painful. The fact that little or nothing is being done by World Governments and the International Maritime Organization to assist and rescue them concerns NAUTICAL LOG very much.


As a result of this international lack of action or caring for the seafarers held hostage many persons seem to think that Piracy is outside the Law.  This attitude was reflected in a comment to our Post "AWAY AND BACK" where the commenter seemed to think that nothing could be done because of jurisdictional issues. Nothing could be further from the truth the only issue in dealing with Piracy once and for all is the will of the International Maritime Organization and the various National Governments of maritime nations.  For some reason which is quite beyond the understanding of NAUTICAL LOG they are entirely unwilling to solve the situation.


The Law itself is quite clear and in meetings, conferences and agreements since the 18th. Century Piracy has been an International crime in response to which any Nation can capture, bring to trial and execute the perpetrators.  The latest update is covered in the Law of Nations by;


United Nations Convention of Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) Articles 101 - 103;


Article 101 - Definition of Piracy.


Article 102 - Piracy by a warship, government ship or aircraft whose crew has mutinied.


Article 103 - Definition of a pirate ship or aircraft.


As to the various Nations they can and do enact National Laws to legalize the UNCLOS in their individual nations.  In some European countries, such as the United Kingdom, there is an Admiralty Court and maritime issues are heard in that venue under British Admiralty Law.  In others such as the United States there is not a separate Admiralty Court and maritime issues are heard in  the U.S. Federal Court.  The U.S. Law covering Piracy is Title 18 USC § 1651 - § 1661;


§ 1651 - Piracy under law of nations


§ 1652 - Citizens as pirates


§ 1653 - Aliens as pirates


§ 1654 - Arming or serving on privateers


§ 1655 - Assault on commander as piracy


§ 1656 - Conversion or surrender of vessel


§ 1657 - Corruption of seamen and confederating with pirates


§ 1658  - Plunder of distressed vessel


§ 1659 - Attack to plunder vessel

§ 1660 - Receipt of pirate property


§ 1661 - Robbery ashore




So as one can clearly see the act of Piracy is defined under U.S. Federal Law and with quite some detail, it is of course an illegal act punishable by death. Most certainly therefore it is not outside or above the Law however that Law of Nations is currently being ignored to the everlasting shame of the International and National Maritime Authorities.


Good Watch.

And now as the MS Iceberg 1 enters her third year of captivity lets us remember the 300 some seafarers held hostage by pirates off the coast of Puntland, Somalia.  They face mutilation and or death every day and absolutely nothing is being done to rescue them. They have died from ill health and by suicide.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

PAINT LOCKER FIRES

The photographs above are revealing in several ways, lets have a look. Clearly the Japanese Maritime Self Defence Force (JMSDF) vessel JS "Kurama" impacted the Korean container ship MS "Carina Star" just aft of the turn of the fo'cs'le on the Starboard side. Please note that's the Starboard side, thus it appears JS "Kurama" would have shown "Carina Star" the red port sidelight and "Carina Star" would have shown JS "Kurama" the green starboard sidelight. This impact point would tend to suggest that JS "Kurama" was the 'stand-on' vessel and the MS "Carina Star" is the 'giving-way' vessel. Until there is a complete plot of the tracks made good of both these vessels and the position in the Kanmon Strait of the point of collision no determination can actually be made. As a result of this impact there was severe bow damage to JS "Kurama" and in addition a massive f

HOW TO WEAR A LIFEJACKET

A popular U.S.-based cruise ship style A popular European ferry style Several times during the year NAUTICAL LOG has had visitors searching for lifejacket instructions. With two just over Christmas we decided to publish something for everybody to see and read. Choose a Coast Guard approved life-jacket and make sure it is undamaged. Make sure life-jackets are readily accessible, never locked away. Check the fit, there are adult, child and infant sizes, the correct one MUST be used. Choose bright colour life-jackets so as to be seen easily by Search and Rescue (SAR). Put your life-jacket ON BEFORE you leave the berth. Make sure you have a light and whistle attached AND they BOTH WORK. Good Watch

BOUILLABAISSE

TAAF Service vessel operated by CMA CGM TAAF Regional flag Well now let us see if here at NAUTICAL LOG we have got a grasp on things simmering in the pot. It seems that when the anti-whaling campaign started out some years ago it was between Greenpeace, the Sea Shepherds and the Japanese whaling fleet. The Australians came down to their own Southern Ocean Territory in a chartered civilian vessel one year. Beyond taking photographs and returning some Sea Shepherds to their ship the MS "Steve Irwin" not much was accomplished. The Greenpeace crowd then dropped out and Animal Planet boarded the MS "Steve Irwin" to shoot 'reality TV' and so Whale Wars came into being. This resulted in some deplorable behaviour on all sides and some appalling exhibitions of seamanship - or rather total lack of seamanship by the Sea Shepherds. But now there was money coming in which could be spent on - well nobody really knows what the money is spent on. New Zealand made it q