Skip to main content

RETURN TO PORT FOR SURVEY

NAUTICAL LOG has studied the raw footage supplied by the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society (SSCS) of their vessel MS Bob Barker in collision with the Japanese Whaling Fleet (JWF) vessel MS Yushin Maru No.2 severe damage to the frame of the MS Bob Barker occurred and is clearly shown.

Severely damaged frames, beams and connection plates of the 1950 64 year old MS Bob Barker
 
The force of the impact can be seen from the violent motion on the Navigation Bridge with personnel being thrown about.  The main frames forward are crushed inboard, bent and possibly fractured with possible further damage to the athwartship beams and the connection plates.  This damage renders the vessel unseaworthy under the International Construction Rules.  It is therefore now the duty of the Master, whether licensed or unlicensed, to bring the vessel to a "safe port" where she can be surveyed as to her seaworthiness.

The MS Bob Barker is an old ship that has been hard used, her keel was laid down in 1950 so that today she is 64 years old and under SSCS usage has been in numerous collisions with largely amateur repairs already made to her main frames and plating.  Having been through several Flag States she is currently under the Netherlands Flag State and registered in Rotterdam.  Thus she is subject to the Safety Rules and Regulations of the European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA) and should proceed to an Australian Port for an approved EMSA Survey.

If this is not done then the Master is placing his vessel and crew in possible great danger should they encounter the very heavy weather of the Southern Ocean and even in the course of daily normal sailing.  Violation of this EMSA Survey is a criminal act.  Therefore should any crewmember now suffer injury or death by continuing to sail in an unseaworthy vessel the Master can be criminally charged with being the cause of such an injury or death. 

In the past the SSCS has shown little concern for their crewmembers, in fact they sign a phony release (see below) when joining these vessels in an attempt for SSCS to avoid lawsuits and penalties.  Since the SSCS Australia is now managed by a former Australian politician it would seem to NAUTICAL LOG that he would be well advised to recall the MS Bob Barker to an Australian Port for a EMSA Construction Survey.

The phony release is listed on the Application Form under Crewmember Expectations of which one paragraph states:

"I agree that I am fully responsible for payment of all medical expenses and other damages arising if I am injured or become ill while volunteering for Sea Shepherd."

How the Netherlands is willing to register a vessel under the conditions of the Sea Shepherd Application Form is beyond the understanding of NAUTICAL LOG.  This medical statement paragraph alone is a complete violation of Maritime Law and the Rules and Regulations of both the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) and EMSA.

The Netherlands should be ashamed to see their Flag State Ensign flying on such a vessel without crew medical care.  The EMSA should step in to detain this vessel as well as any other vessel's flying the Netherlands Ensign under these conditions.

Good Watch.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

PAINT LOCKER FIRES

The photographs above are revealing in several ways, lets have a look. Clearly the Japanese Maritime Self Defence Force (JMSDF) vessel JS "Kurama" impacted the Korean container ship MS "Carina Star" just aft of the turn of the fo'cs'le on the Starboard side. Please note that's the Starboard side, thus it appears JS "Kurama" would have shown "Carina Star" the red port sidelight and "Carina Star" would have shown JS "Kurama" the green starboard sidelight. This impact point would tend to suggest that JS "Kurama" was the 'stand-on' vessel and the MS "Carina Star" is the 'giving-way' vessel. Until there is a complete plot of the tracks made good of both these vessels and the position in the Kanmon Strait of the point of collision no determination can actually be made. As a result of this impact there was severe bow damage to JS "Kurama" and in addition a massive f

HOW TO WEAR A LIFEJACKET

A popular U.S.-based cruise ship style A popular European ferry style Several times during the year NAUTICAL LOG has had visitors searching for lifejacket instructions. With two just over Christmas we decided to publish something for everybody to see and read. Choose a Coast Guard approved life-jacket and make sure it is undamaged. Make sure life-jackets are readily accessible, never locked away. Check the fit, there are adult, child and infant sizes, the correct one MUST be used. Choose bright colour life-jackets so as to be seen easily by Search and Rescue (SAR). Put your life-jacket ON BEFORE you leave the berth. Make sure you have a light and whistle attached AND they BOTH WORK. Good Watch

BOUILLABAISSE

TAAF Service vessel operated by CMA CGM TAAF Regional flag Well now let us see if here at NAUTICAL LOG we have got a grasp on things simmering in the pot. It seems that when the anti-whaling campaign started out some years ago it was between Greenpeace, the Sea Shepherds and the Japanese whaling fleet. The Australians came down to their own Southern Ocean Territory in a chartered civilian vessel one year. Beyond taking photographs and returning some Sea Shepherds to their ship the MS "Steve Irwin" not much was accomplished. The Greenpeace crowd then dropped out and Animal Planet boarded the MS "Steve Irwin" to shoot 'reality TV' and so Whale Wars came into being. This resulted in some deplorable behaviour on all sides and some appalling exhibitions of seamanship - or rather total lack of seamanship by the Sea Shepherds. But now there was money coming in which could be spent on - well nobody really knows what the money is spent on. New Zealand made it q